Self hosted Snappy Store
Just like a self-hosted deb repository, is it possible to self-host a Snappy Store for private snapps? I have found that debs can be converted to snapps and that snapps can be submitted to the Ubuntu Snappy Store but I am unable to gather any details about a privately hosted Store.
ubuntu-core
add a comment |
Just like a self-hosted deb repository, is it possible to self-host a Snappy Store for private snapps? I have found that debs can be converted to snapps and that snapps can be submitted to the Ubuntu Snappy Store but I am unable to gather any details about a privately hosted Store.
ubuntu-core
you could probably fork webdm, and rewrite it -code.launchpad.net/webdm - otherwise there isn't any private store - but yeah I don't see anything stoping people from writing their own web interface. or just hosting them to download and local install...
– Mateo
Jul 13 '15 at 0:38
add a comment |
Just like a self-hosted deb repository, is it possible to self-host a Snappy Store for private snapps? I have found that debs can be converted to snapps and that snapps can be submitted to the Ubuntu Snappy Store but I am unable to gather any details about a privately hosted Store.
ubuntu-core
Just like a self-hosted deb repository, is it possible to self-host a Snappy Store for private snapps? I have found that debs can be converted to snapps and that snapps can be submitted to the Ubuntu Snappy Store but I am unable to gather any details about a privately hosted Store.
ubuntu-core
ubuntu-core
edited Jul 12 '15 at 21:12
awoz
asked Jul 12 '15 at 19:17
awozawoz
184
184
you could probably fork webdm, and rewrite it -code.launchpad.net/webdm - otherwise there isn't any private store - but yeah I don't see anything stoping people from writing their own web interface. or just hosting them to download and local install...
– Mateo
Jul 13 '15 at 0:38
add a comment |
you could probably fork webdm, and rewrite it -code.launchpad.net/webdm - otherwise there isn't any private store - but yeah I don't see anything stoping people from writing their own web interface. or just hosting them to download and local install...
– Mateo
Jul 13 '15 at 0:38
you could probably fork webdm, and rewrite it -code.launchpad.net/webdm - otherwise there isn't any private store - but yeah I don't see anything stoping people from writing their own web interface. or just hosting them to download and local install...
– Mateo
Jul 13 '15 at 0:38
you could probably fork webdm, and rewrite it -code.launchpad.net/webdm - otherwise there isn't any private store - but yeah I don't see anything stoping people from writing their own web interface. or just hosting them to download and local install...
– Mateo
Jul 13 '15 at 0:38
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
You can't. Snap is a monopoly, it has been designed to be fully controlled by Canonical, even "Branded Stores" have to be on their servers.
Private snaps also must be registered on their store so you will always be tied to their censorship and downtimes.
There was an alternative (https://github.com/noise/snapstore) but Canonical modified Snap to make it harder to work (ex: you can't create Ubuntu Core images with snap packages that aren't registered on their store, etc..).
I recommend you to avoid snap & ubuntu core and try any other alternative like Flatpak or AppImage.
add a comment |
This question have been asked on the #snappy IRC channel and they answered that, for the time being, there will be only one repository.
add a comment |
protected by Community♦ May 5 '16 at 15:42
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can't. Snap is a monopoly, it has been designed to be fully controlled by Canonical, even "Branded Stores" have to be on their servers.
Private snaps also must be registered on their store so you will always be tied to their censorship and downtimes.
There was an alternative (https://github.com/noise/snapstore) but Canonical modified Snap to make it harder to work (ex: you can't create Ubuntu Core images with snap packages that aren't registered on their store, etc..).
I recommend you to avoid snap & ubuntu core and try any other alternative like Flatpak or AppImage.
add a comment |
You can't. Snap is a monopoly, it has been designed to be fully controlled by Canonical, even "Branded Stores" have to be on their servers.
Private snaps also must be registered on their store so you will always be tied to their censorship and downtimes.
There was an alternative (https://github.com/noise/snapstore) but Canonical modified Snap to make it harder to work (ex: you can't create Ubuntu Core images with snap packages that aren't registered on their store, etc..).
I recommend you to avoid snap & ubuntu core and try any other alternative like Flatpak or AppImage.
add a comment |
You can't. Snap is a monopoly, it has been designed to be fully controlled by Canonical, even "Branded Stores" have to be on their servers.
Private snaps also must be registered on their store so you will always be tied to their censorship and downtimes.
There was an alternative (https://github.com/noise/snapstore) but Canonical modified Snap to make it harder to work (ex: you can't create Ubuntu Core images with snap packages that aren't registered on their store, etc..).
I recommend you to avoid snap & ubuntu core and try any other alternative like Flatpak or AppImage.
You can't. Snap is a monopoly, it has been designed to be fully controlled by Canonical, even "Branded Stores" have to be on their servers.
Private snaps also must be registered on their store so you will always be tied to their censorship and downtimes.
There was an alternative (https://github.com/noise/snapstore) but Canonical modified Snap to make it harder to work (ex: you can't create Ubuntu Core images with snap packages that aren't registered on their store, etc..).
I recommend you to avoid snap & ubuntu core and try any other alternative like Flatpak or AppImage.
answered Feb 28 at 10:35
FrakyDaleFrakyDale
797
797
add a comment |
add a comment |
This question have been asked on the #snappy IRC channel and they answered that, for the time being, there will be only one repository.
add a comment |
This question have been asked on the #snappy IRC channel and they answered that, for the time being, there will be only one repository.
add a comment |
This question have been asked on the #snappy IRC channel and they answered that, for the time being, there will be only one repository.
This question have been asked on the #snappy IRC channel and they answered that, for the time being, there will be only one repository.
answered Aug 5 '15 at 9:31
clobranoclobrano
16716
16716
add a comment |
add a comment |
protected by Community♦ May 5 '16 at 15:42
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
you could probably fork webdm, and rewrite it -code.launchpad.net/webdm - otherwise there isn't any private store - but yeah I don't see anything stoping people from writing their own web interface. or just hosting them to download and local install...
– Mateo
Jul 13 '15 at 0:38