pdfTeX hangs with this input











up vote
8
down vote

favorite
1












I know that formula expression is mistyped, but I dont know why pdfTex is frozen(possibly infinite loop) instead of quting nicely? Is there a workaround? Because in case of an erronous input, I need to restart my server.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
usepackage{draftwatermark}
usepackage{breqn}
usepackage{amsmath}
SetWatermarkText{FAST MATH}
SetWatermarkScale{2}
SetWatermarkVerCenter{0.6paperheight}
SetWatermarkAngle{30}

begin{document}

section{Input}
$left. begin{array} { l } { a ) A = { 2 $
section{Solution}
${a: 0}$
end{document}









share|improve this question









New contributor




heral is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Try running pdflatex with the -halt-on-error commandline option.
    – Eric Marsden
    13 hours ago










  • What do you mean with frozen? Usually it should prompt and wait for input (you will see an asterisk * on that line). That is to avoid redoing all compilation, but provide a way to "inline edit" the error. The alternative: fix all errors…
    – TeXnician
    13 hours ago










  • Btw: you have to load breqn after amsmath
    – DG'
    13 hours ago










  • you can't avoid all loops, setup your server so that it times out if necessary.
    – Ulrike Fischer
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    It seems, in your comments here and to other answers, that your question has more to do with how to handle a condition where a program you're creating/writing has problems when pdflatex hangs due to invalid input; rather than asking what is wrong with the sample input. If so ... you might want to edit this question and its title appropriately to describe what you're really trying to ask. And it may even be the case that this is more appropriately handled elsewhere on Stack Exchange, for example, at Stack Overflow.
    – davidbak
    9 hours ago















up vote
8
down vote

favorite
1












I know that formula expression is mistyped, but I dont know why pdfTex is frozen(possibly infinite loop) instead of quting nicely? Is there a workaround? Because in case of an erronous input, I need to restart my server.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
usepackage{draftwatermark}
usepackage{breqn}
usepackage{amsmath}
SetWatermarkText{FAST MATH}
SetWatermarkScale{2}
SetWatermarkVerCenter{0.6paperheight}
SetWatermarkAngle{30}

begin{document}

section{Input}
$left. begin{array} { l } { a ) A = { 2 $
section{Solution}
${a: 0}$
end{document}









share|improve this question









New contributor




heral is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Try running pdflatex with the -halt-on-error commandline option.
    – Eric Marsden
    13 hours ago










  • What do you mean with frozen? Usually it should prompt and wait for input (you will see an asterisk * on that line). That is to avoid redoing all compilation, but provide a way to "inline edit" the error. The alternative: fix all errors…
    – TeXnician
    13 hours ago










  • Btw: you have to load breqn after amsmath
    – DG'
    13 hours ago










  • you can't avoid all loops, setup your server so that it times out if necessary.
    – Ulrike Fischer
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    It seems, in your comments here and to other answers, that your question has more to do with how to handle a condition where a program you're creating/writing has problems when pdflatex hangs due to invalid input; rather than asking what is wrong with the sample input. If so ... you might want to edit this question and its title appropriately to describe what you're really trying to ask. And it may even be the case that this is more appropriately handled elsewhere on Stack Exchange, for example, at Stack Overflow.
    – davidbak
    9 hours ago













up vote
8
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
8
down vote

favorite
1






1





I know that formula expression is mistyped, but I dont know why pdfTex is frozen(possibly infinite loop) instead of quting nicely? Is there a workaround? Because in case of an erronous input, I need to restart my server.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
usepackage{draftwatermark}
usepackage{breqn}
usepackage{amsmath}
SetWatermarkText{FAST MATH}
SetWatermarkScale{2}
SetWatermarkVerCenter{0.6paperheight}
SetWatermarkAngle{30}

begin{document}

section{Input}
$left. begin{array} { l } { a ) A = { 2 $
section{Solution}
${a: 0}$
end{document}









share|improve this question









New contributor




heral is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I know that formula expression is mistyped, but I dont know why pdfTex is frozen(possibly infinite loop) instead of quting nicely? Is there a workaround? Because in case of an erronous input, I need to restart my server.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
usepackage{draftwatermark}
usepackage{breqn}
usepackage{amsmath}
SetWatermarkText{FAST MATH}
SetWatermarkScale{2}
SetWatermarkVerCenter{0.6paperheight}
SetWatermarkAngle{30}

begin{document}

section{Input}
$left. begin{array} { l } { a ) A = { 2 $
section{Solution}
${a: 0}$
end{document}






pdftex






share|improve this question









New contributor




heral is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




heral is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 13 hours ago









zyy

640613




640613






New contributor




heral is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 13 hours ago









heral

441




441




New contributor




heral is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





heral is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






heral is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • Try running pdflatex with the -halt-on-error commandline option.
    – Eric Marsden
    13 hours ago










  • What do you mean with frozen? Usually it should prompt and wait for input (you will see an asterisk * on that line). That is to avoid redoing all compilation, but provide a way to "inline edit" the error. The alternative: fix all errors…
    – TeXnician
    13 hours ago










  • Btw: you have to load breqn after amsmath
    – DG'
    13 hours ago










  • you can't avoid all loops, setup your server so that it times out if necessary.
    – Ulrike Fischer
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    It seems, in your comments here and to other answers, that your question has more to do with how to handle a condition where a program you're creating/writing has problems when pdflatex hangs due to invalid input; rather than asking what is wrong with the sample input. If so ... you might want to edit this question and its title appropriately to describe what you're really trying to ask. And it may even be the case that this is more appropriately handled elsewhere on Stack Exchange, for example, at Stack Overflow.
    – davidbak
    9 hours ago


















  • Try running pdflatex with the -halt-on-error commandline option.
    – Eric Marsden
    13 hours ago










  • What do you mean with frozen? Usually it should prompt and wait for input (you will see an asterisk * on that line). That is to avoid redoing all compilation, but provide a way to "inline edit" the error. The alternative: fix all errors…
    – TeXnician
    13 hours ago










  • Btw: you have to load breqn after amsmath
    – DG'
    13 hours ago










  • you can't avoid all loops, setup your server so that it times out if necessary.
    – Ulrike Fischer
    13 hours ago






  • 1




    It seems, in your comments here and to other answers, that your question has more to do with how to handle a condition where a program you're creating/writing has problems when pdflatex hangs due to invalid input; rather than asking what is wrong with the sample input. If so ... you might want to edit this question and its title appropriately to describe what you're really trying to ask. And it may even be the case that this is more appropriately handled elsewhere on Stack Exchange, for example, at Stack Overflow.
    – davidbak
    9 hours ago
















Try running pdflatex with the -halt-on-error commandline option.
– Eric Marsden
13 hours ago




Try running pdflatex with the -halt-on-error commandline option.
– Eric Marsden
13 hours ago












What do you mean with frozen? Usually it should prompt and wait for input (you will see an asterisk * on that line). That is to avoid redoing all compilation, but provide a way to "inline edit" the error. The alternative: fix all errors…
– TeXnician
13 hours ago




What do you mean with frozen? Usually it should prompt and wait for input (you will see an asterisk * on that line). That is to avoid redoing all compilation, but provide a way to "inline edit" the error. The alternative: fix all errors…
– TeXnician
13 hours ago












Btw: you have to load breqn after amsmath
– DG'
13 hours ago




Btw: you have to load breqn after amsmath
– DG'
13 hours ago












you can't avoid all loops, setup your server so that it times out if necessary.
– Ulrike Fischer
13 hours ago




you can't avoid all loops, setup your server so that it times out if necessary.
– Ulrike Fischer
13 hours ago




1




1




It seems, in your comments here and to other answers, that your question has more to do with how to handle a condition where a program you're creating/writing has problems when pdflatex hangs due to invalid input; rather than asking what is wrong with the sample input. If so ... you might want to edit this question and its title appropriately to describe what you're really trying to ask. And it may even be the case that this is more appropriately handled elsewhere on Stack Exchange, for example, at Stack Overflow.
– davidbak
9 hours ago




It seems, in your comments here and to other answers, that your question has more to do with how to handle a condition where a program you're creating/writing has problems when pdflatex hangs due to invalid input; rather than asking what is wrong with the sample input. If so ... you might want to edit this question and its title appropriately to describe what you're really trying to ask. And it may even be the case that this is more appropriately handled elsewhere on Stack Exchange, for example, at Stack Overflow.
– davidbak
9 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
9
down vote













The issue can be reproduced with a smaller example, showing it has nothing to do with the loaded packages:



documentclass{article}

begin{document}

$left. begin{array} { l } { a ) A = { 2 $

section{Solution}
${a: 0}$

end{document}


The errors in the math formula, followed by the section title, make TeX enter an infinite loop announced by



! LaTeX Error: begin{array} on input line 7 ended by end{document}.

See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation.
Type H <return> for immediate help.
...

l.12 end{document}

?

! Improper prevdepth.
newpage ...everypar {}fi par ifdim prevdepth
>z@ vskip -ifdim prevd...
l.12 end{document}


The missing end{array} causes par to still be defined as “do nothing” like it always is in array. Since the error recovery here is to try doing end{document}, LaTeX tries to finish up the page issuing par, which does nothing.



If we add tracingmacros=1, after the last error message we see, in the log file after interrupting the program, a string of



par ->

par ->

par ->

par ->

par ->


Solution: don't make silly errors in your input.



Another solution could be running pdflatex with the option -halt-on-error, which would stop it at the first error.



However, this is not foolproof. If the user has deffoo{foo} in their preamble, then the first usage of foo in the document would start an infinite loop with no error.






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    "Solution: don't make silly errors in your input." unfortuntely this is unavoidable as I explained.
    – heral
    13 hours ago


















up vote
3
down vote













You have unbalanced environments/braces; begin{array} doesn't have end{array} and left. doesn't have right... Also, load breqn after amsmath and add lmodern for preventing missing font sizes substitution.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx,lmodern}
usepackage{draftwatermark}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{breqn}
SetWatermarkText{FAST MATH}
SetWatermarkScale{2}
SetWatermarkVerCenter{0.6paperheight}
SetWatermarkAngle{30}

begin{document}

section{Input}
$ begin{array} { l } a) A = { 2 end{array}$
section{Solution}
${a: 0}$

end{document}





share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    I know that there is unbalanced expression in the tex file(there may always be, as some part of it user input), what I need is frozen free pdfTex.
    – heral
    13 hours ago


















up vote
1
down vote













I am not sure of what you are trying to typeset, but please try the following



documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
usepackage{draftwatermark}
usepackage{amsmath}

SetWatermarkText{FAST MATH}
SetWatermarkScale{0.8}
SetWatermarkVerCenter{0.6paperheight}
SetWatermarkAngle{30}

begin{document}

section{Input}
begin{equation}
left. begin{array}{c}
l \
a \
end{array} right), quad A = { 2
end{equation}
section{Solution}
${a: 0}$
end{document}


Please use compiler XeLaTeX.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Why should you use XeLaTeX for this?
    – TeXnician
    13 hours ago


















up vote
1
down vote













It seems that I am unable to comment on a comment. Weird system or what?



So I am making this into an unsatisfactory answer to your question about the existence of a “workaround” your particular class of “unavoidable silly (or unavoidably silly?) errors”



@heral: (Trying to be nice!) Yes, we are all, well most of us, often silly and we make many errors.
But that is not sufficient reason for there being “workarounds” for all of the silly errrors made by you, and also those made by everyone else.



More technically: It is regrettable that some errors, even some that are non-silly and avoidable, lead to non-space filling recursion (causing an infinite loop or ‘hanging’). There is a theorem somewhere stating that any sufficiently useful software system will provide the possibility of such ‘hanging’ errors and, moreover, that it is impossible to know about and hence trap them all. — no Universal Workarounds! Tough!)






share|improve this answer








New contributor




PGSan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















  • Welcome! For the first paragraph look here.
    – manooooh
    5 hours ago













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






heral is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f461319%2fpdftex-hangs-with-this-input%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes








4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
9
down vote













The issue can be reproduced with a smaller example, showing it has nothing to do with the loaded packages:



documentclass{article}

begin{document}

$left. begin{array} { l } { a ) A = { 2 $

section{Solution}
${a: 0}$

end{document}


The errors in the math formula, followed by the section title, make TeX enter an infinite loop announced by



! LaTeX Error: begin{array} on input line 7 ended by end{document}.

See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation.
Type H <return> for immediate help.
...

l.12 end{document}

?

! Improper prevdepth.
newpage ...everypar {}fi par ifdim prevdepth
>z@ vskip -ifdim prevd...
l.12 end{document}


The missing end{array} causes par to still be defined as “do nothing” like it always is in array. Since the error recovery here is to try doing end{document}, LaTeX tries to finish up the page issuing par, which does nothing.



If we add tracingmacros=1, after the last error message we see, in the log file after interrupting the program, a string of



par ->

par ->

par ->

par ->

par ->


Solution: don't make silly errors in your input.



Another solution could be running pdflatex with the option -halt-on-error, which would stop it at the first error.



However, this is not foolproof. If the user has deffoo{foo} in their preamble, then the first usage of foo in the document would start an infinite loop with no error.






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    "Solution: don't make silly errors in your input." unfortuntely this is unavoidable as I explained.
    – heral
    13 hours ago















up vote
9
down vote













The issue can be reproduced with a smaller example, showing it has nothing to do with the loaded packages:



documentclass{article}

begin{document}

$left. begin{array} { l } { a ) A = { 2 $

section{Solution}
${a: 0}$

end{document}


The errors in the math formula, followed by the section title, make TeX enter an infinite loop announced by



! LaTeX Error: begin{array} on input line 7 ended by end{document}.

See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation.
Type H <return> for immediate help.
...

l.12 end{document}

?

! Improper prevdepth.
newpage ...everypar {}fi par ifdim prevdepth
>z@ vskip -ifdim prevd...
l.12 end{document}


The missing end{array} causes par to still be defined as “do nothing” like it always is in array. Since the error recovery here is to try doing end{document}, LaTeX tries to finish up the page issuing par, which does nothing.



If we add tracingmacros=1, after the last error message we see, in the log file after interrupting the program, a string of



par ->

par ->

par ->

par ->

par ->


Solution: don't make silly errors in your input.



Another solution could be running pdflatex with the option -halt-on-error, which would stop it at the first error.



However, this is not foolproof. If the user has deffoo{foo} in their preamble, then the first usage of foo in the document would start an infinite loop with no error.






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    "Solution: don't make silly errors in your input." unfortuntely this is unavoidable as I explained.
    – heral
    13 hours ago













up vote
9
down vote










up vote
9
down vote









The issue can be reproduced with a smaller example, showing it has nothing to do with the loaded packages:



documentclass{article}

begin{document}

$left. begin{array} { l } { a ) A = { 2 $

section{Solution}
${a: 0}$

end{document}


The errors in the math formula, followed by the section title, make TeX enter an infinite loop announced by



! LaTeX Error: begin{array} on input line 7 ended by end{document}.

See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation.
Type H <return> for immediate help.
...

l.12 end{document}

?

! Improper prevdepth.
newpage ...everypar {}fi par ifdim prevdepth
>z@ vskip -ifdim prevd...
l.12 end{document}


The missing end{array} causes par to still be defined as “do nothing” like it always is in array. Since the error recovery here is to try doing end{document}, LaTeX tries to finish up the page issuing par, which does nothing.



If we add tracingmacros=1, after the last error message we see, in the log file after interrupting the program, a string of



par ->

par ->

par ->

par ->

par ->


Solution: don't make silly errors in your input.



Another solution could be running pdflatex with the option -halt-on-error, which would stop it at the first error.



However, this is not foolproof. If the user has deffoo{foo} in their preamble, then the first usage of foo in the document would start an infinite loop with no error.






share|improve this answer














The issue can be reproduced with a smaller example, showing it has nothing to do with the loaded packages:



documentclass{article}

begin{document}

$left. begin{array} { l } { a ) A = { 2 $

section{Solution}
${a: 0}$

end{document}


The errors in the math formula, followed by the section title, make TeX enter an infinite loop announced by



! LaTeX Error: begin{array} on input line 7 ended by end{document}.

See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation.
Type H <return> for immediate help.
...

l.12 end{document}

?

! Improper prevdepth.
newpage ...everypar {}fi par ifdim prevdepth
>z@ vskip -ifdim prevd...
l.12 end{document}


The missing end{array} causes par to still be defined as “do nothing” like it always is in array. Since the error recovery here is to try doing end{document}, LaTeX tries to finish up the page issuing par, which does nothing.



If we add tracingmacros=1, after the last error message we see, in the log file after interrupting the program, a string of



par ->

par ->

par ->

par ->

par ->


Solution: don't make silly errors in your input.



Another solution could be running pdflatex with the option -halt-on-error, which would stop it at the first error.



However, this is not foolproof. If the user has deffoo{foo} in their preamble, then the first usage of foo in the document would start an infinite loop with no error.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 12 hours ago

























answered 13 hours ago









egreg

699k8518583127




699k8518583127








  • 1




    "Solution: don't make silly errors in your input." unfortuntely this is unavoidable as I explained.
    – heral
    13 hours ago














  • 1




    "Solution: don't make silly errors in your input." unfortuntely this is unavoidable as I explained.
    – heral
    13 hours ago








1




1




"Solution: don't make silly errors in your input." unfortuntely this is unavoidable as I explained.
– heral
13 hours ago




"Solution: don't make silly errors in your input." unfortuntely this is unavoidable as I explained.
– heral
13 hours ago










up vote
3
down vote













You have unbalanced environments/braces; begin{array} doesn't have end{array} and left. doesn't have right... Also, load breqn after amsmath and add lmodern for preventing missing font sizes substitution.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx,lmodern}
usepackage{draftwatermark}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{breqn}
SetWatermarkText{FAST MATH}
SetWatermarkScale{2}
SetWatermarkVerCenter{0.6paperheight}
SetWatermarkAngle{30}

begin{document}

section{Input}
$ begin{array} { l } a) A = { 2 end{array}$
section{Solution}
${a: 0}$

end{document}





share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    I know that there is unbalanced expression in the tex file(there may always be, as some part of it user input), what I need is frozen free pdfTex.
    – heral
    13 hours ago















up vote
3
down vote













You have unbalanced environments/braces; begin{array} doesn't have end{array} and left. doesn't have right... Also, load breqn after amsmath and add lmodern for preventing missing font sizes substitution.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx,lmodern}
usepackage{draftwatermark}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{breqn}
SetWatermarkText{FAST MATH}
SetWatermarkScale{2}
SetWatermarkVerCenter{0.6paperheight}
SetWatermarkAngle{30}

begin{document}

section{Input}
$ begin{array} { l } a) A = { 2 end{array}$
section{Solution}
${a: 0}$

end{document}





share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    I know that there is unbalanced expression in the tex file(there may always be, as some part of it user input), what I need is frozen free pdfTex.
    – heral
    13 hours ago













up vote
3
down vote










up vote
3
down vote









You have unbalanced environments/braces; begin{array} doesn't have end{array} and left. doesn't have right... Also, load breqn after amsmath and add lmodern for preventing missing font sizes substitution.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx,lmodern}
usepackage{draftwatermark}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{breqn}
SetWatermarkText{FAST MATH}
SetWatermarkScale{2}
SetWatermarkVerCenter{0.6paperheight}
SetWatermarkAngle{30}

begin{document}

section{Input}
$ begin{array} { l } a) A = { 2 end{array}$
section{Solution}
${a: 0}$

end{document}





share|improve this answer












You have unbalanced environments/braces; begin{array} doesn't have end{array} and left. doesn't have right... Also, load breqn after amsmath and add lmodern for preventing missing font sizes substitution.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx,lmodern}
usepackage{draftwatermark}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{breqn}
SetWatermarkText{FAST MATH}
SetWatermarkScale{2}
SetWatermarkVerCenter{0.6paperheight}
SetWatermarkAngle{30}

begin{document}

section{Input}
$ begin{array} { l } a) A = { 2 end{array}$
section{Solution}
${a: 0}$

end{document}






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 13 hours ago









AboAmmar

31k22780




31k22780








  • 1




    I know that there is unbalanced expression in the tex file(there may always be, as some part of it user input), what I need is frozen free pdfTex.
    – heral
    13 hours ago














  • 1




    I know that there is unbalanced expression in the tex file(there may always be, as some part of it user input), what I need is frozen free pdfTex.
    – heral
    13 hours ago








1




1




I know that there is unbalanced expression in the tex file(there may always be, as some part of it user input), what I need is frozen free pdfTex.
– heral
13 hours ago




I know that there is unbalanced expression in the tex file(there may always be, as some part of it user input), what I need is frozen free pdfTex.
– heral
13 hours ago










up vote
1
down vote













I am not sure of what you are trying to typeset, but please try the following



documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
usepackage{draftwatermark}
usepackage{amsmath}

SetWatermarkText{FAST MATH}
SetWatermarkScale{0.8}
SetWatermarkVerCenter{0.6paperheight}
SetWatermarkAngle{30}

begin{document}

section{Input}
begin{equation}
left. begin{array}{c}
l \
a \
end{array} right), quad A = { 2
end{equation}
section{Solution}
${a: 0}$
end{document}


Please use compiler XeLaTeX.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Why should you use XeLaTeX for this?
    – TeXnician
    13 hours ago















up vote
1
down vote













I am not sure of what you are trying to typeset, but please try the following



documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
usepackage{draftwatermark}
usepackage{amsmath}

SetWatermarkText{FAST MATH}
SetWatermarkScale{0.8}
SetWatermarkVerCenter{0.6paperheight}
SetWatermarkAngle{30}

begin{document}

section{Input}
begin{equation}
left. begin{array}{c}
l \
a \
end{array} right), quad A = { 2
end{equation}
section{Solution}
${a: 0}$
end{document}


Please use compiler XeLaTeX.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Why should you use XeLaTeX for this?
    – TeXnician
    13 hours ago













up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









I am not sure of what you are trying to typeset, but please try the following



documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
usepackage{draftwatermark}
usepackage{amsmath}

SetWatermarkText{FAST MATH}
SetWatermarkScale{0.8}
SetWatermarkVerCenter{0.6paperheight}
SetWatermarkAngle{30}

begin{document}

section{Input}
begin{equation}
left. begin{array}{c}
l \
a \
end{array} right), quad A = { 2
end{equation}
section{Solution}
${a: 0}$
end{document}


Please use compiler XeLaTeX.






share|improve this answer












I am not sure of what you are trying to typeset, but please try the following



documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
usepackage{draftwatermark}
usepackage{amsmath}

SetWatermarkText{FAST MATH}
SetWatermarkScale{0.8}
SetWatermarkVerCenter{0.6paperheight}
SetWatermarkAngle{30}

begin{document}

section{Input}
begin{equation}
left. begin{array}{c}
l \
a \
end{array} right), quad A = { 2
end{equation}
section{Solution}
${a: 0}$
end{document}


Please use compiler XeLaTeX.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 13 hours ago









zyy

640613




640613








  • 1




    Why should you use XeLaTeX for this?
    – TeXnician
    13 hours ago














  • 1




    Why should you use XeLaTeX for this?
    – TeXnician
    13 hours ago








1




1




Why should you use XeLaTeX for this?
– TeXnician
13 hours ago




Why should you use XeLaTeX for this?
– TeXnician
13 hours ago










up vote
1
down vote













It seems that I am unable to comment on a comment. Weird system or what?



So I am making this into an unsatisfactory answer to your question about the existence of a “workaround” your particular class of “unavoidable silly (or unavoidably silly?) errors”



@heral: (Trying to be nice!) Yes, we are all, well most of us, often silly and we make many errors.
But that is not sufficient reason for there being “workarounds” for all of the silly errrors made by you, and also those made by everyone else.



More technically: It is regrettable that some errors, even some that are non-silly and avoidable, lead to non-space filling recursion (causing an infinite loop or ‘hanging’). There is a theorem somewhere stating that any sufficiently useful software system will provide the possibility of such ‘hanging’ errors and, moreover, that it is impossible to know about and hence trap them all. — no Universal Workarounds! Tough!)






share|improve this answer








New contributor




PGSan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















  • Welcome! For the first paragraph look here.
    – manooooh
    5 hours ago

















up vote
1
down vote













It seems that I am unable to comment on a comment. Weird system or what?



So I am making this into an unsatisfactory answer to your question about the existence of a “workaround” your particular class of “unavoidable silly (or unavoidably silly?) errors”



@heral: (Trying to be nice!) Yes, we are all, well most of us, often silly and we make many errors.
But that is not sufficient reason for there being “workarounds” for all of the silly errrors made by you, and also those made by everyone else.



More technically: It is regrettable that some errors, even some that are non-silly and avoidable, lead to non-space filling recursion (causing an infinite loop or ‘hanging’). There is a theorem somewhere stating that any sufficiently useful software system will provide the possibility of such ‘hanging’ errors and, moreover, that it is impossible to know about and hence trap them all. — no Universal Workarounds! Tough!)






share|improve this answer








New contributor




PGSan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















  • Welcome! For the first paragraph look here.
    – manooooh
    5 hours ago















up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









It seems that I am unable to comment on a comment. Weird system or what?



So I am making this into an unsatisfactory answer to your question about the existence of a “workaround” your particular class of “unavoidable silly (or unavoidably silly?) errors”



@heral: (Trying to be nice!) Yes, we are all, well most of us, often silly and we make many errors.
But that is not sufficient reason for there being “workarounds” for all of the silly errrors made by you, and also those made by everyone else.



More technically: It is regrettable that some errors, even some that are non-silly and avoidable, lead to non-space filling recursion (causing an infinite loop or ‘hanging’). There is a theorem somewhere stating that any sufficiently useful software system will provide the possibility of such ‘hanging’ errors and, moreover, that it is impossible to know about and hence trap them all. — no Universal Workarounds! Tough!)






share|improve this answer








New contributor




PGSan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









It seems that I am unable to comment on a comment. Weird system or what?



So I am making this into an unsatisfactory answer to your question about the existence of a “workaround” your particular class of “unavoidable silly (or unavoidably silly?) errors”



@heral: (Trying to be nice!) Yes, we are all, well most of us, often silly and we make many errors.
But that is not sufficient reason for there being “workarounds” for all of the silly errrors made by you, and also those made by everyone else.



More technically: It is regrettable that some errors, even some that are non-silly and avoidable, lead to non-space filling recursion (causing an infinite loop or ‘hanging’). There is a theorem somewhere stating that any sufficiently useful software system will provide the possibility of such ‘hanging’ errors and, moreover, that it is impossible to know about and hence trap them all. — no Universal Workarounds! Tough!)







share|improve this answer








New contributor




PGSan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer






New contributor




PGSan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered 8 hours ago









PGSan

113




113




New contributor




PGSan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





PGSan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






PGSan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • Welcome! For the first paragraph look here.
    – manooooh
    5 hours ago




















  • Welcome! For the first paragraph look here.
    – manooooh
    5 hours ago


















Welcome! For the first paragraph look here.
– manooooh
5 hours ago






Welcome! For the first paragraph look here.
– manooooh
5 hours ago












heral is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










 

draft saved


draft discarded


















heral is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













heral is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












heral is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f461319%2fpdftex-hangs-with-this-input%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

flock() on closed filehandle LOCK_FILE at /usr/bin/apt-mirror

Mangá

Eduardo VII do Reino Unido