Two down arrows over specific separator lines of an array
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
I need to make a figure like the attached image, which contains multiple arrays, two down arrows over the specific separator line of first array and text above these two arrows. I could make the arrays in align environment but the problem us arrows and text above them. I used the code below to make the arrays as a figure:
begin{figure}[!ht]
begin{align*}
overrightarrow{P}_{1}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3 & alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8 & alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{P}_{2}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right] \
\
overrightarrow{S}_{1}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{S}_{2}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right]
end{align*}
caption{An example}
end{figure}
floats arrows arrays
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
I need to make a figure like the attached image, which contains multiple arrays, two down arrows over the specific separator line of first array and text above these two arrows. I could make the arrays in align environment but the problem us arrows and text above them. I used the code below to make the arrays as a figure:
begin{figure}[!ht]
begin{align*}
overrightarrow{P}_{1}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3 & alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8 & alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{P}_{2}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right] \
\
overrightarrow{S}_{1}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{S}_{2}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right]
end{align*}
caption{An example}
end{figure}
floats arrows arrays
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
I need to make a figure like the attached image, which contains multiple arrays, two down arrows over the specific separator line of first array and text above these two arrows. I could make the arrays in align environment but the problem us arrows and text above them. I used the code below to make the arrays as a figure:
begin{figure}[!ht]
begin{align*}
overrightarrow{P}_{1}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3 & alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8 & alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{P}_{2}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right] \
\
overrightarrow{S}_{1}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{S}_{2}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right]
end{align*}
caption{An example}
end{figure}
floats arrows arrays
New contributor
I need to make a figure like the attached image, which contains multiple arrays, two down arrows over the specific separator line of first array and text above these two arrows. I could make the arrays in align environment but the problem us arrows and text above them. I used the code below to make the arrays as a figure:
begin{figure}[!ht]
begin{align*}
overrightarrow{P}_{1}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3 & alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8 & alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{P}_{2}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right] \
\
overrightarrow{S}_{1}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{S}_{2}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right]
end{align*}
caption{An example}
end{figure}
floats arrows arrays
floats arrows arrays
New contributor
New contributor
edited 15 hours ago
New contributor
asked 15 hours ago
M. Mojrian
314
314
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
since you include this two equations as figure, why not draw them? for example, draw them with tikz
and use of the library matrix
:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta, matrix, positioning}
begin{document}
begin{figure}[htb]
centering
begin{tikzpicture}[
node distance = 9mm and 1.5mm,
arr/.style = {draw=red, very thick, Trinagle-, shorten <=1mm},
mtrx/.style = {matrix of math nodes,
nodes={minimum width=2em},
left delimiter={[},
right delimiter={]},
inner ysep=1pt, inner xsep=-2pt}
]
matrix (m) [mtrx]
{
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3 & alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8 & alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta_9 \
};
node[left=of m] {$vec{P}=$};
%
matrix (n) [mtrx, right=of n0]
{
alpha_1' & alpha_2' & alpha_3' & alpha_4' & alpha_5' & alpha_6' & alpha_7' & alpha_8' & alpha_9' \
beta_1' & beta_2' & beta_3' & beta_4' & beta_5' & beta_6' & beta_7' & beta_8' & beta_9' \
};
node[left=of n]{$vec{S}_1$};
%
foreach i in {1,...,8}
{
draw (m-1-i.north east) -- (m-2-i.south east);
draw (n-1-i.north east) -- (n-2-i.south east);
}
path[arr]
(m-1-3.north east) -- + (0,0.5) node[above] {$mathbf{P1}$};
path[arr]
(m-1-8.north east) -- + (0,0.5) node[above] {$mathbf{P2}$};
end{tikzpicture}
caption{An example of applied two-point quantum crossover}
label{fig:equation}
end{figure}
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
After the new tikzmarklibrary
, which contains the fabulous command tikzmarknode
, was uploaded to CTAN and became part of the standard TeX installations, there is no need to translate existing tables or matrices to TikZ since now you can use tikzmarknode
to do all the things that were harder before. That is, you can keep what you have and just add the annotations with TikZ and with minimal effort.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{tikzmark,calc}
begin{document}
begin{figure}[!ht]
vspace*{0.6cm}
begin{align*}
overrightarrow{P}_{1}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & tikzmarknode{a3}{alpha_3} & tikzmarknode{a4}{alpha_4} & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & tikzmarknode{a8}{alpha_8} & tikzmarknode{a9}{alpha_9} \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{P}_{2}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right] \
\
overrightarrow{S}_{1}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{S}_{2}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right]
end{align*}
begin{tikzpicture}[overlay,remember picture]
draw[line width=1mm,latex-,red] ($(a3.north east)!0.5!(a4.north west)+(0,0.1)$) -- ++(0,0.6) node[black,above]{$P_1$};
draw[line width=1mm,latex-,red] ($(a8.north east)!0.5!(a9.north west)+(0,0.1)$) -- ++(0,0.5)node[black,above]{$P_2$};;
end{tikzpicture}
caption{An example}
end{figure}
end{document}
tikzmark
library is indeed powerful, however transforming ``matrix` toarray
is not so big deal (except that drawing vertical lines require separate command) ;-). +1 for nice answer!
– Zarko
10 hours ago
@Zarko Well, you are very powerful with tables, so you know better than me that you can do things with tables which are very hard to reproduce with a TikZmatrix
. Features that are hard to get with a TikZmatrix
include aligning the decimal points and so on. In the present situation I agree that you can use a TikZmatrix
in a very elegant way, but at the very moment in which the OP really makes use ofalign*
it will be harder. So I guess everything will depend on what the OP ultimately wants to do, which we do not know.
– marmot
10 hours ago
i agree with you. the tools which you use are depend on task.
– Zarko
9 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
You can place the P_1
and P_2
markers using eso-pic
's absolute positioning mechanism - placing it in the F
oreG
round of the current page (via AddToShipoutPictureFG*
). zref
's savepos
module allows you to capture the x,y coordinates of a <label>
(set using zsavepos{<label>}
) which can be retrieved using zposx
/zposy
(both expandable).
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,zref-savepos,eso-pic}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
& \ % Just to leave an empty line
overrightarrow{P}_1
& left[
begin{array}{ *{8}{c|} c }
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3zsavepos{P1L} & zsavepos{P1R}alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8zsavepos{P2L} & zsavepos{P2R}alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{P}_2
& left[
begin{array}{ *{8}{c|} c }
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right] \
\
overrightarrow{S}_1
& left[
begin{array}{ *{8}{c|} c }
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{S}_2
& left[
begin{array}{ *{8}{c|} c }
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right]
end{align*}
AddToShipoutPictureFG*{%
AtPageLowerLeft{%
hspace{0.5dimexprzposx{P1L}sp+zposx{P1R}sprelax}%
raisebox{dimexprzposy{P1L}sp+1.5baselineskip}{makebox[0pt]{$substack{P_1 \ downarrow}$}}%
}%
AtPageLowerLeft{%
hspace{0.5dimexprzposx{P2L}sp+zposx{P2R}sprelax}%
raisebox{dimexprzposy{P1L}sp+1.5baselineskip}{makebox[0pt]{$substack{P_2 \ downarrow}$}}%
}%
}
end{document}
Above I place two markers around the array
column divider for each of P_1
and P_2
(denoted with a L
eft and R
ight suffix) and position the labels to be at the horizontal centre of these markers.
An empty line within the align*
is left at the top in order to avoid unnecessary interaction with content appearing above the environment.
Since the markers use TeX's label
-ref
-like system, any change in the location of the markers requires an additional compilation so reference can settle.
Voted positively all for your excellent skill.
– Sebastiano
8 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
since you include this two equations as figure, why not draw them? for example, draw them with tikz
and use of the library matrix
:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta, matrix, positioning}
begin{document}
begin{figure}[htb]
centering
begin{tikzpicture}[
node distance = 9mm and 1.5mm,
arr/.style = {draw=red, very thick, Trinagle-, shorten <=1mm},
mtrx/.style = {matrix of math nodes,
nodes={minimum width=2em},
left delimiter={[},
right delimiter={]},
inner ysep=1pt, inner xsep=-2pt}
]
matrix (m) [mtrx]
{
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3 & alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8 & alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta_9 \
};
node[left=of m] {$vec{P}=$};
%
matrix (n) [mtrx, right=of n0]
{
alpha_1' & alpha_2' & alpha_3' & alpha_4' & alpha_5' & alpha_6' & alpha_7' & alpha_8' & alpha_9' \
beta_1' & beta_2' & beta_3' & beta_4' & beta_5' & beta_6' & beta_7' & beta_8' & beta_9' \
};
node[left=of n]{$vec{S}_1$};
%
foreach i in {1,...,8}
{
draw (m-1-i.north east) -- (m-2-i.south east);
draw (n-1-i.north east) -- (n-2-i.south east);
}
path[arr]
(m-1-3.north east) -- + (0,0.5) node[above] {$mathbf{P1}$};
path[arr]
(m-1-8.north east) -- + (0,0.5) node[above] {$mathbf{P2}$};
end{tikzpicture}
caption{An example of applied two-point quantum crossover}
label{fig:equation}
end{figure}
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
since you include this two equations as figure, why not draw them? for example, draw them with tikz
and use of the library matrix
:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta, matrix, positioning}
begin{document}
begin{figure}[htb]
centering
begin{tikzpicture}[
node distance = 9mm and 1.5mm,
arr/.style = {draw=red, very thick, Trinagle-, shorten <=1mm},
mtrx/.style = {matrix of math nodes,
nodes={minimum width=2em},
left delimiter={[},
right delimiter={]},
inner ysep=1pt, inner xsep=-2pt}
]
matrix (m) [mtrx]
{
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3 & alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8 & alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta_9 \
};
node[left=of m] {$vec{P}=$};
%
matrix (n) [mtrx, right=of n0]
{
alpha_1' & alpha_2' & alpha_3' & alpha_4' & alpha_5' & alpha_6' & alpha_7' & alpha_8' & alpha_9' \
beta_1' & beta_2' & beta_3' & beta_4' & beta_5' & beta_6' & beta_7' & beta_8' & beta_9' \
};
node[left=of n]{$vec{S}_1$};
%
foreach i in {1,...,8}
{
draw (m-1-i.north east) -- (m-2-i.south east);
draw (n-1-i.north east) -- (n-2-i.south east);
}
path[arr]
(m-1-3.north east) -- + (0,0.5) node[above] {$mathbf{P1}$};
path[arr]
(m-1-8.north east) -- + (0,0.5) node[above] {$mathbf{P2}$};
end{tikzpicture}
caption{An example of applied two-point quantum crossover}
label{fig:equation}
end{figure}
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
since you include this two equations as figure, why not draw them? for example, draw them with tikz
and use of the library matrix
:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta, matrix, positioning}
begin{document}
begin{figure}[htb]
centering
begin{tikzpicture}[
node distance = 9mm and 1.5mm,
arr/.style = {draw=red, very thick, Trinagle-, shorten <=1mm},
mtrx/.style = {matrix of math nodes,
nodes={minimum width=2em},
left delimiter={[},
right delimiter={]},
inner ysep=1pt, inner xsep=-2pt}
]
matrix (m) [mtrx]
{
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3 & alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8 & alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta_9 \
};
node[left=of m] {$vec{P}=$};
%
matrix (n) [mtrx, right=of n0]
{
alpha_1' & alpha_2' & alpha_3' & alpha_4' & alpha_5' & alpha_6' & alpha_7' & alpha_8' & alpha_9' \
beta_1' & beta_2' & beta_3' & beta_4' & beta_5' & beta_6' & beta_7' & beta_8' & beta_9' \
};
node[left=of n]{$vec{S}_1$};
%
foreach i in {1,...,8}
{
draw (m-1-i.north east) -- (m-2-i.south east);
draw (n-1-i.north east) -- (n-2-i.south east);
}
path[arr]
(m-1-3.north east) -- + (0,0.5) node[above] {$mathbf{P1}$};
path[arr]
(m-1-8.north east) -- + (0,0.5) node[above] {$mathbf{P2}$};
end{tikzpicture}
caption{An example of applied two-point quantum crossover}
label{fig:equation}
end{figure}
end{document}
since you include this two equations as figure, why not draw them? for example, draw them with tikz
and use of the library matrix
:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta, matrix, positioning}
begin{document}
begin{figure}[htb]
centering
begin{tikzpicture}[
node distance = 9mm and 1.5mm,
arr/.style = {draw=red, very thick, Trinagle-, shorten <=1mm},
mtrx/.style = {matrix of math nodes,
nodes={minimum width=2em},
left delimiter={[},
right delimiter={]},
inner ysep=1pt, inner xsep=-2pt}
]
matrix (m) [mtrx]
{
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3 & alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8 & alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta_9 \
};
node[left=of m] {$vec{P}=$};
%
matrix (n) [mtrx, right=of n0]
{
alpha_1' & alpha_2' & alpha_3' & alpha_4' & alpha_5' & alpha_6' & alpha_7' & alpha_8' & alpha_9' \
beta_1' & beta_2' & beta_3' & beta_4' & beta_5' & beta_6' & beta_7' & beta_8' & beta_9' \
};
node[left=of n]{$vec{S}_1$};
%
foreach i in {1,...,8}
{
draw (m-1-i.north east) -- (m-2-i.south east);
draw (n-1-i.north east) -- (n-2-i.south east);
}
path[arr]
(m-1-3.north east) -- + (0,0.5) node[above] {$mathbf{P1}$};
path[arr]
(m-1-8.north east) -- + (0,0.5) node[above] {$mathbf{P2}$};
end{tikzpicture}
caption{An example of applied two-point quantum crossover}
label{fig:equation}
end{figure}
end{document}
edited 10 hours ago
answered 14 hours ago
Zarko
116k865154
116k865154
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
After the new tikzmarklibrary
, which contains the fabulous command tikzmarknode
, was uploaded to CTAN and became part of the standard TeX installations, there is no need to translate existing tables or matrices to TikZ since now you can use tikzmarknode
to do all the things that were harder before. That is, you can keep what you have and just add the annotations with TikZ and with minimal effort.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{tikzmark,calc}
begin{document}
begin{figure}[!ht]
vspace*{0.6cm}
begin{align*}
overrightarrow{P}_{1}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & tikzmarknode{a3}{alpha_3} & tikzmarknode{a4}{alpha_4} & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & tikzmarknode{a8}{alpha_8} & tikzmarknode{a9}{alpha_9} \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{P}_{2}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right] \
\
overrightarrow{S}_{1}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{S}_{2}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right]
end{align*}
begin{tikzpicture}[overlay,remember picture]
draw[line width=1mm,latex-,red] ($(a3.north east)!0.5!(a4.north west)+(0,0.1)$) -- ++(0,0.6) node[black,above]{$P_1$};
draw[line width=1mm,latex-,red] ($(a8.north east)!0.5!(a9.north west)+(0,0.1)$) -- ++(0,0.5)node[black,above]{$P_2$};;
end{tikzpicture}
caption{An example}
end{figure}
end{document}
tikzmark
library is indeed powerful, however transforming ``matrix` toarray
is not so big deal (except that drawing vertical lines require separate command) ;-). +1 for nice answer!
– Zarko
10 hours ago
@Zarko Well, you are very powerful with tables, so you know better than me that you can do things with tables which are very hard to reproduce with a TikZmatrix
. Features that are hard to get with a TikZmatrix
include aligning the decimal points and so on. In the present situation I agree that you can use a TikZmatrix
in a very elegant way, but at the very moment in which the OP really makes use ofalign*
it will be harder. So I guess everything will depend on what the OP ultimately wants to do, which we do not know.
– marmot
10 hours ago
i agree with you. the tools which you use are depend on task.
– Zarko
9 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
After the new tikzmarklibrary
, which contains the fabulous command tikzmarknode
, was uploaded to CTAN and became part of the standard TeX installations, there is no need to translate existing tables or matrices to TikZ since now you can use tikzmarknode
to do all the things that were harder before. That is, you can keep what you have and just add the annotations with TikZ and with minimal effort.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{tikzmark,calc}
begin{document}
begin{figure}[!ht]
vspace*{0.6cm}
begin{align*}
overrightarrow{P}_{1}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & tikzmarknode{a3}{alpha_3} & tikzmarknode{a4}{alpha_4} & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & tikzmarknode{a8}{alpha_8} & tikzmarknode{a9}{alpha_9} \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{P}_{2}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right] \
\
overrightarrow{S}_{1}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{S}_{2}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right]
end{align*}
begin{tikzpicture}[overlay,remember picture]
draw[line width=1mm,latex-,red] ($(a3.north east)!0.5!(a4.north west)+(0,0.1)$) -- ++(0,0.6) node[black,above]{$P_1$};
draw[line width=1mm,latex-,red] ($(a8.north east)!0.5!(a9.north west)+(0,0.1)$) -- ++(0,0.5)node[black,above]{$P_2$};;
end{tikzpicture}
caption{An example}
end{figure}
end{document}
tikzmark
library is indeed powerful, however transforming ``matrix` toarray
is not so big deal (except that drawing vertical lines require separate command) ;-). +1 for nice answer!
– Zarko
10 hours ago
@Zarko Well, you are very powerful with tables, so you know better than me that you can do things with tables which are very hard to reproduce with a TikZmatrix
. Features that are hard to get with a TikZmatrix
include aligning the decimal points and so on. In the present situation I agree that you can use a TikZmatrix
in a very elegant way, but at the very moment in which the OP really makes use ofalign*
it will be harder. So I guess everything will depend on what the OP ultimately wants to do, which we do not know.
– marmot
10 hours ago
i agree with you. the tools which you use are depend on task.
– Zarko
9 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
After the new tikzmarklibrary
, which contains the fabulous command tikzmarknode
, was uploaded to CTAN and became part of the standard TeX installations, there is no need to translate existing tables or matrices to TikZ since now you can use tikzmarknode
to do all the things that were harder before. That is, you can keep what you have and just add the annotations with TikZ and with minimal effort.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{tikzmark,calc}
begin{document}
begin{figure}[!ht]
vspace*{0.6cm}
begin{align*}
overrightarrow{P}_{1}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & tikzmarknode{a3}{alpha_3} & tikzmarknode{a4}{alpha_4} & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & tikzmarknode{a8}{alpha_8} & tikzmarknode{a9}{alpha_9} \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{P}_{2}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right] \
\
overrightarrow{S}_{1}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{S}_{2}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right]
end{align*}
begin{tikzpicture}[overlay,remember picture]
draw[line width=1mm,latex-,red] ($(a3.north east)!0.5!(a4.north west)+(0,0.1)$) -- ++(0,0.6) node[black,above]{$P_1$};
draw[line width=1mm,latex-,red] ($(a8.north east)!0.5!(a9.north west)+(0,0.1)$) -- ++(0,0.5)node[black,above]{$P_2$};;
end{tikzpicture}
caption{An example}
end{figure}
end{document}
After the new tikzmarklibrary
, which contains the fabulous command tikzmarknode
, was uploaded to CTAN and became part of the standard TeX installations, there is no need to translate existing tables or matrices to TikZ since now you can use tikzmarknode
to do all the things that were harder before. That is, you can keep what you have and just add the annotations with TikZ and with minimal effort.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{tikzmark,calc}
begin{document}
begin{figure}[!ht]
vspace*{0.6cm}
begin{align*}
overrightarrow{P}_{1}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & tikzmarknode{a3}{alpha_3} & tikzmarknode{a4}{alpha_4} & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & tikzmarknode{a8}{alpha_8} & tikzmarknode{a9}{alpha_9} \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{P}_{2}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right] \
\
overrightarrow{S}_{1}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{S}_{2}
&left[
begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right]
end{align*}
begin{tikzpicture}[overlay,remember picture]
draw[line width=1mm,latex-,red] ($(a3.north east)!0.5!(a4.north west)+(0,0.1)$) -- ++(0,0.6) node[black,above]{$P_1$};
draw[line width=1mm,latex-,red] ($(a8.north east)!0.5!(a9.north west)+(0,0.1)$) -- ++(0,0.5)node[black,above]{$P_2$};;
end{tikzpicture}
caption{An example}
end{figure}
end{document}
answered 12 hours ago
marmot
77.1k487162
77.1k487162
tikzmark
library is indeed powerful, however transforming ``matrix` toarray
is not so big deal (except that drawing vertical lines require separate command) ;-). +1 for nice answer!
– Zarko
10 hours ago
@Zarko Well, you are very powerful with tables, so you know better than me that you can do things with tables which are very hard to reproduce with a TikZmatrix
. Features that are hard to get with a TikZmatrix
include aligning the decimal points and so on. In the present situation I agree that you can use a TikZmatrix
in a very elegant way, but at the very moment in which the OP really makes use ofalign*
it will be harder. So I guess everything will depend on what the OP ultimately wants to do, which we do not know.
– marmot
10 hours ago
i agree with you. the tools which you use are depend on task.
– Zarko
9 hours ago
add a comment |
tikzmark
library is indeed powerful, however transforming ``matrix` toarray
is not so big deal (except that drawing vertical lines require separate command) ;-). +1 for nice answer!
– Zarko
10 hours ago
@Zarko Well, you are very powerful with tables, so you know better than me that you can do things with tables which are very hard to reproduce with a TikZmatrix
. Features that are hard to get with a TikZmatrix
include aligning the decimal points and so on. In the present situation I agree that you can use a TikZmatrix
in a very elegant way, but at the very moment in which the OP really makes use ofalign*
it will be harder. So I guess everything will depend on what the OP ultimately wants to do, which we do not know.
– marmot
10 hours ago
i agree with you. the tools which you use are depend on task.
– Zarko
9 hours ago
tikzmark
library is indeed powerful, however transforming ``matrix` to array
is not so big deal (except that drawing vertical lines require separate command) ;-). +1 for nice answer!– Zarko
10 hours ago
tikzmark
library is indeed powerful, however transforming ``matrix` to array
is not so big deal (except that drawing vertical lines require separate command) ;-). +1 for nice answer!– Zarko
10 hours ago
@Zarko Well, you are very powerful with tables, so you know better than me that you can do things with tables which are very hard to reproduce with a TikZ
matrix
. Features that are hard to get with a TikZ matrix
include aligning the decimal points and so on. In the present situation I agree that you can use a TikZ matrix
in a very elegant way, but at the very moment in which the OP really makes use of align*
it will be harder. So I guess everything will depend on what the OP ultimately wants to do, which we do not know.– marmot
10 hours ago
@Zarko Well, you are very powerful with tables, so you know better than me that you can do things with tables which are very hard to reproduce with a TikZ
matrix
. Features that are hard to get with a TikZ matrix
include aligning the decimal points and so on. In the present situation I agree that you can use a TikZ matrix
in a very elegant way, but at the very moment in which the OP really makes use of align*
it will be harder. So I guess everything will depend on what the OP ultimately wants to do, which we do not know.– marmot
10 hours ago
i agree with you. the tools which you use are depend on task.
– Zarko
9 hours ago
i agree with you. the tools which you use are depend on task.
– Zarko
9 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
You can place the P_1
and P_2
markers using eso-pic
's absolute positioning mechanism - placing it in the F
oreG
round of the current page (via AddToShipoutPictureFG*
). zref
's savepos
module allows you to capture the x,y coordinates of a <label>
(set using zsavepos{<label>}
) which can be retrieved using zposx
/zposy
(both expandable).
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,zref-savepos,eso-pic}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
& \ % Just to leave an empty line
overrightarrow{P}_1
& left[
begin{array}{ *{8}{c|} c }
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3zsavepos{P1L} & zsavepos{P1R}alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8zsavepos{P2L} & zsavepos{P2R}alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{P}_2
& left[
begin{array}{ *{8}{c|} c }
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right] \
\
overrightarrow{S}_1
& left[
begin{array}{ *{8}{c|} c }
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{S}_2
& left[
begin{array}{ *{8}{c|} c }
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right]
end{align*}
AddToShipoutPictureFG*{%
AtPageLowerLeft{%
hspace{0.5dimexprzposx{P1L}sp+zposx{P1R}sprelax}%
raisebox{dimexprzposy{P1L}sp+1.5baselineskip}{makebox[0pt]{$substack{P_1 \ downarrow}$}}%
}%
AtPageLowerLeft{%
hspace{0.5dimexprzposx{P2L}sp+zposx{P2R}sprelax}%
raisebox{dimexprzposy{P1L}sp+1.5baselineskip}{makebox[0pt]{$substack{P_2 \ downarrow}$}}%
}%
}
end{document}
Above I place two markers around the array
column divider for each of P_1
and P_2
(denoted with a L
eft and R
ight suffix) and position the labels to be at the horizontal centre of these markers.
An empty line within the align*
is left at the top in order to avoid unnecessary interaction with content appearing above the environment.
Since the markers use TeX's label
-ref
-like system, any change in the location of the markers requires an additional compilation so reference can settle.
Voted positively all for your excellent skill.
– Sebastiano
8 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
You can place the P_1
and P_2
markers using eso-pic
's absolute positioning mechanism - placing it in the F
oreG
round of the current page (via AddToShipoutPictureFG*
). zref
's savepos
module allows you to capture the x,y coordinates of a <label>
(set using zsavepos{<label>}
) which can be retrieved using zposx
/zposy
(both expandable).
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,zref-savepos,eso-pic}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
& \ % Just to leave an empty line
overrightarrow{P}_1
& left[
begin{array}{ *{8}{c|} c }
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3zsavepos{P1L} & zsavepos{P1R}alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8zsavepos{P2L} & zsavepos{P2R}alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{P}_2
& left[
begin{array}{ *{8}{c|} c }
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right] \
\
overrightarrow{S}_1
& left[
begin{array}{ *{8}{c|} c }
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{S}_2
& left[
begin{array}{ *{8}{c|} c }
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right]
end{align*}
AddToShipoutPictureFG*{%
AtPageLowerLeft{%
hspace{0.5dimexprzposx{P1L}sp+zposx{P1R}sprelax}%
raisebox{dimexprzposy{P1L}sp+1.5baselineskip}{makebox[0pt]{$substack{P_1 \ downarrow}$}}%
}%
AtPageLowerLeft{%
hspace{0.5dimexprzposx{P2L}sp+zposx{P2R}sprelax}%
raisebox{dimexprzposy{P1L}sp+1.5baselineskip}{makebox[0pt]{$substack{P_2 \ downarrow}$}}%
}%
}
end{document}
Above I place two markers around the array
column divider for each of P_1
and P_2
(denoted with a L
eft and R
ight suffix) and position the labels to be at the horizontal centre of these markers.
An empty line within the align*
is left at the top in order to avoid unnecessary interaction with content appearing above the environment.
Since the markers use TeX's label
-ref
-like system, any change in the location of the markers requires an additional compilation so reference can settle.
Voted positively all for your excellent skill.
– Sebastiano
8 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
You can place the P_1
and P_2
markers using eso-pic
's absolute positioning mechanism - placing it in the F
oreG
round of the current page (via AddToShipoutPictureFG*
). zref
's savepos
module allows you to capture the x,y coordinates of a <label>
(set using zsavepos{<label>}
) which can be retrieved using zposx
/zposy
(both expandable).
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,zref-savepos,eso-pic}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
& \ % Just to leave an empty line
overrightarrow{P}_1
& left[
begin{array}{ *{8}{c|} c }
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3zsavepos{P1L} & zsavepos{P1R}alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8zsavepos{P2L} & zsavepos{P2R}alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{P}_2
& left[
begin{array}{ *{8}{c|} c }
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right] \
\
overrightarrow{S}_1
& left[
begin{array}{ *{8}{c|} c }
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{S}_2
& left[
begin{array}{ *{8}{c|} c }
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right]
end{align*}
AddToShipoutPictureFG*{%
AtPageLowerLeft{%
hspace{0.5dimexprzposx{P1L}sp+zposx{P1R}sprelax}%
raisebox{dimexprzposy{P1L}sp+1.5baselineskip}{makebox[0pt]{$substack{P_1 \ downarrow}$}}%
}%
AtPageLowerLeft{%
hspace{0.5dimexprzposx{P2L}sp+zposx{P2R}sprelax}%
raisebox{dimexprzposy{P1L}sp+1.5baselineskip}{makebox[0pt]{$substack{P_2 \ downarrow}$}}%
}%
}
end{document}
Above I place two markers around the array
column divider for each of P_1
and P_2
(denoted with a L
eft and R
ight suffix) and position the labels to be at the horizontal centre of these markers.
An empty line within the align*
is left at the top in order to avoid unnecessary interaction with content appearing above the environment.
Since the markers use TeX's label
-ref
-like system, any change in the location of the markers requires an additional compilation so reference can settle.
You can place the P_1
and P_2
markers using eso-pic
's absolute positioning mechanism - placing it in the F
oreG
round of the current page (via AddToShipoutPictureFG*
). zref
's savepos
module allows you to capture the x,y coordinates of a <label>
(set using zsavepos{<label>}
) which can be retrieved using zposx
/zposy
(both expandable).
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,zref-savepos,eso-pic}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
& \ % Just to leave an empty line
overrightarrow{P}_1
& left[
begin{array}{ *{8}{c|} c }
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3zsavepos{P1L} & zsavepos{P1R}alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8zsavepos{P2L} & zsavepos{P2R}alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{P}_2
& left[
begin{array}{ *{8}{c|} c }
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right] \
\
overrightarrow{S}_1
& left[
begin{array}{ *{8}{c|} c }
alpha_1 & alpha_2 & alpha_3 & alpha^prime_4 & alpha^prime_5 & alpha^prime_6 & alpha^prime_7 & alpha^prime_8 & alpha_9 \
beta_1 & beta_2 & beta_3 & beta^prime_4 & beta^prime_5 & beta^prime_6 & beta^prime_7 & beta^prime_8 & beta_9 \
end{array}
right] \
overrightarrow{S}_2
& left[
begin{array}{ *{8}{c|} c }
alpha^prime_1 & alpha^prime_2 & alpha^prime_3 & alpha_4 & alpha_5 & alpha_6 & alpha_7 & alpha_8 & alpha^prime_9 \
beta^prime_1 & beta^prime_2 & beta^prime_3 & beta_4 & beta_5 & beta_6 & beta_7 & beta_8 & beta^prime_9 \
end{array}
right]
end{align*}
AddToShipoutPictureFG*{%
AtPageLowerLeft{%
hspace{0.5dimexprzposx{P1L}sp+zposx{P1R}sprelax}%
raisebox{dimexprzposy{P1L}sp+1.5baselineskip}{makebox[0pt]{$substack{P_1 \ downarrow}$}}%
}%
AtPageLowerLeft{%
hspace{0.5dimexprzposx{P2L}sp+zposx{P2R}sprelax}%
raisebox{dimexprzposy{P1L}sp+1.5baselineskip}{makebox[0pt]{$substack{P_2 \ downarrow}$}}%
}%
}
end{document}
Above I place two markers around the array
column divider for each of P_1
and P_2
(denoted with a L
eft and R
ight suffix) and position the labels to be at the horizontal centre of these markers.
An empty line within the align*
is left at the top in order to avoid unnecessary interaction with content appearing above the environment.
Since the markers use TeX's label
-ref
-like system, any change in the location of the markers requires an additional compilation so reference can settle.
answered 10 hours ago
Werner
431k599491626
431k599491626
Voted positively all for your excellent skill.
– Sebastiano
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Voted positively all for your excellent skill.
– Sebastiano
8 hours ago
Voted positively all for your excellent skill.
– Sebastiano
8 hours ago
Voted positively all for your excellent skill.
– Sebastiano
8 hours ago
add a comment |
M. Mojrian is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
M. Mojrian is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
M. Mojrian is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
M. Mojrian is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f461281%2ftwo-down-arrows-over-specific-separator-lines-of-an-array%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown