Splitting a single Cat5 cable to run signals from Router and HDMI-over-Cat5
I have a cable box and router both located in an A/V closet and a single Cat5 line running from the closet to a TV in a separate location in the house. The Cat5 line is currently dedicated to HDMI-over-Cat5 use for the purpose of running the signal from the cable box to the TV. I would love to be able to have a wired connection running from the Router the TV as well, for purposes of streaming smart-tv applications with speed and reliability. Is it possible to split the Cat5 line at both ends so that both signals (i.e., from the (1) cable box (via HDMI extender) and (2) the Router) can be run simultaneously?
cat5
add a comment |
I have a cable box and router both located in an A/V closet and a single Cat5 line running from the closet to a TV in a separate location in the house. The Cat5 line is currently dedicated to HDMI-over-Cat5 use for the purpose of running the signal from the cable box to the TV. I would love to be able to have a wired connection running from the Router the TV as well, for purposes of streaming smart-tv applications with speed and reliability. Is it possible to split the Cat5 line at both ends so that both signals (i.e., from the (1) cable box (via HDMI extender) and (2) the Router) can be run simultaneously?
cat5
add a comment |
I have a cable box and router both located in an A/V closet and a single Cat5 line running from the closet to a TV in a separate location in the house. The Cat5 line is currently dedicated to HDMI-over-Cat5 use for the purpose of running the signal from the cable box to the TV. I would love to be able to have a wired connection running from the Router the TV as well, for purposes of streaming smart-tv applications with speed and reliability. Is it possible to split the Cat5 line at both ends so that both signals (i.e., from the (1) cable box (via HDMI extender) and (2) the Router) can be run simultaneously?
cat5
I have a cable box and router both located in an A/V closet and a single Cat5 line running from the closet to a TV in a separate location in the house. The Cat5 line is currently dedicated to HDMI-over-Cat5 use for the purpose of running the signal from the cable box to the TV. I would love to be able to have a wired connection running from the Router the TV as well, for purposes of streaming smart-tv applications with speed and reliability. Is it possible to split the Cat5 line at both ends so that both signals (i.e., from the (1) cable box (via HDMI extender) and (2) the Router) can be run simultaneously?
cat5
cat5
asked Jan 6 at 21:24
BK DavidBK David
61
61
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Maybe. It is possible to do a 10mb connection just using 2 pairs (of the 4 available) - but it isn't recommended, or even "the right way".
If 10mb is OK for you, AND the HDMI-over-CAT5 doesn't need more than 4 pairs, then you should be good to go.
If the HDMI-over-CAT5 needs all 4 pairs, or 3 of 'em, then you need to run a second line. Hopefully the existing line isn't stapled down, etc. and can be used as a pull-through so you don't need to get up in the attic, etc.
1
You can get 100Mbps on two pair as well.
– HazardousGlitch
Jan 7 at 0:03
@HazardousGlitch full or half duplex?
– ivanivan
Jan 7 at 2:56
Either or but I wouldn't recommend half duplex.
– HazardousGlitch
Jan 7 at 3:28
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1391267%2fsplitting-a-single-cat5-cable-to-run-signals-from-router-and-hdmi-over-cat5%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Maybe. It is possible to do a 10mb connection just using 2 pairs (of the 4 available) - but it isn't recommended, or even "the right way".
If 10mb is OK for you, AND the HDMI-over-CAT5 doesn't need more than 4 pairs, then you should be good to go.
If the HDMI-over-CAT5 needs all 4 pairs, or 3 of 'em, then you need to run a second line. Hopefully the existing line isn't stapled down, etc. and can be used as a pull-through so you don't need to get up in the attic, etc.
1
You can get 100Mbps on two pair as well.
– HazardousGlitch
Jan 7 at 0:03
@HazardousGlitch full or half duplex?
– ivanivan
Jan 7 at 2:56
Either or but I wouldn't recommend half duplex.
– HazardousGlitch
Jan 7 at 3:28
add a comment |
Maybe. It is possible to do a 10mb connection just using 2 pairs (of the 4 available) - but it isn't recommended, or even "the right way".
If 10mb is OK for you, AND the HDMI-over-CAT5 doesn't need more than 4 pairs, then you should be good to go.
If the HDMI-over-CAT5 needs all 4 pairs, or 3 of 'em, then you need to run a second line. Hopefully the existing line isn't stapled down, etc. and can be used as a pull-through so you don't need to get up in the attic, etc.
1
You can get 100Mbps on two pair as well.
– HazardousGlitch
Jan 7 at 0:03
@HazardousGlitch full or half duplex?
– ivanivan
Jan 7 at 2:56
Either or but I wouldn't recommend half duplex.
– HazardousGlitch
Jan 7 at 3:28
add a comment |
Maybe. It is possible to do a 10mb connection just using 2 pairs (of the 4 available) - but it isn't recommended, or even "the right way".
If 10mb is OK for you, AND the HDMI-over-CAT5 doesn't need more than 4 pairs, then you should be good to go.
If the HDMI-over-CAT5 needs all 4 pairs, or 3 of 'em, then you need to run a second line. Hopefully the existing line isn't stapled down, etc. and can be used as a pull-through so you don't need to get up in the attic, etc.
Maybe. It is possible to do a 10mb connection just using 2 pairs (of the 4 available) - but it isn't recommended, or even "the right way".
If 10mb is OK for you, AND the HDMI-over-CAT5 doesn't need more than 4 pairs, then you should be good to go.
If the HDMI-over-CAT5 needs all 4 pairs, or 3 of 'em, then you need to run a second line. Hopefully the existing line isn't stapled down, etc. and can be used as a pull-through so you don't need to get up in the attic, etc.
answered Jan 6 at 23:29
ivanivanivanivan
1,20917
1,20917
1
You can get 100Mbps on two pair as well.
– HazardousGlitch
Jan 7 at 0:03
@HazardousGlitch full or half duplex?
– ivanivan
Jan 7 at 2:56
Either or but I wouldn't recommend half duplex.
– HazardousGlitch
Jan 7 at 3:28
add a comment |
1
You can get 100Mbps on two pair as well.
– HazardousGlitch
Jan 7 at 0:03
@HazardousGlitch full or half duplex?
– ivanivan
Jan 7 at 2:56
Either or but I wouldn't recommend half duplex.
– HazardousGlitch
Jan 7 at 3:28
1
1
You can get 100Mbps on two pair as well.
– HazardousGlitch
Jan 7 at 0:03
You can get 100Mbps on two pair as well.
– HazardousGlitch
Jan 7 at 0:03
@HazardousGlitch full or half duplex?
– ivanivan
Jan 7 at 2:56
@HazardousGlitch full or half duplex?
– ivanivan
Jan 7 at 2:56
Either or but I wouldn't recommend half duplex.
– HazardousGlitch
Jan 7 at 3:28
Either or but I wouldn't recommend half duplex.
– HazardousGlitch
Jan 7 at 3:28
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1391267%2fsplitting-a-single-cat5-cable-to-run-signals-from-router-and-hdmi-over-cat5%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown