SLES 11 update glibc using rpm
I'm trying to upgrade glibc but I'm getting failed dependencies however it also says the dependencies is (installed)? Should I run it with ignore all dependencies?
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (x86_64)
localhost:~ # rpm -U glibc-2.14.1-14.28.3.x86_64.rpm
warning: glibc-2.14.1-14.28.3.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID b5daf13d
error: Failed dependencies:
glibc = 2.11.1 is needed by (installed) glibc-locale-2.11.1-0.17.4.x86_64
glibc = 2.11.1 is needed by (installed) glibc-devel-2.11.1-0.17.4.x86_64
rpm suse glibc
add a comment |
I'm trying to upgrade glibc but I'm getting failed dependencies however it also says the dependencies is (installed)? Should I run it with ignore all dependencies?
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (x86_64)
localhost:~ # rpm -U glibc-2.14.1-14.28.3.x86_64.rpm
warning: glibc-2.14.1-14.28.3.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID b5daf13d
error: Failed dependencies:
glibc = 2.11.1 is needed by (installed) glibc-locale-2.11.1-0.17.4.x86_64
glibc = 2.11.1 is needed by (installed) glibc-devel-2.11.1-0.17.4.x86_64
rpm suse glibc
1
I just checked and it looks like the rpm I downloaded is for SLES 12. There isn't a 2.14 glibc for SLES11. Is that right?
– lbanz
Nov 20 '15 at 10:32
add a comment |
I'm trying to upgrade glibc but I'm getting failed dependencies however it also says the dependencies is (installed)? Should I run it with ignore all dependencies?
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (x86_64)
localhost:~ # rpm -U glibc-2.14.1-14.28.3.x86_64.rpm
warning: glibc-2.14.1-14.28.3.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID b5daf13d
error: Failed dependencies:
glibc = 2.11.1 is needed by (installed) glibc-locale-2.11.1-0.17.4.x86_64
glibc = 2.11.1 is needed by (installed) glibc-devel-2.11.1-0.17.4.x86_64
rpm suse glibc
I'm trying to upgrade glibc but I'm getting failed dependencies however it also says the dependencies is (installed)? Should I run it with ignore all dependencies?
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (x86_64)
localhost:~ # rpm -U glibc-2.14.1-14.28.3.x86_64.rpm
warning: glibc-2.14.1-14.28.3.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID b5daf13d
error: Failed dependencies:
glibc = 2.11.1 is needed by (installed) glibc-locale-2.11.1-0.17.4.x86_64
glibc = 2.11.1 is needed by (installed) glibc-devel-2.11.1-0.17.4.x86_64
rpm suse glibc
rpm suse glibc
asked Nov 20 '15 at 10:27
lbanzlbanz
12117
12117
1
I just checked and it looks like the rpm I downloaded is for SLES 12. There isn't a 2.14 glibc for SLES11. Is that right?
– lbanz
Nov 20 '15 at 10:32
add a comment |
1
I just checked and it looks like the rpm I downloaded is for SLES 12. There isn't a 2.14 glibc for SLES11. Is that right?
– lbanz
Nov 20 '15 at 10:32
1
1
I just checked and it looks like the rpm I downloaded is for SLES 12. There isn't a 2.14 glibc for SLES11. Is that right?
– lbanz
Nov 20 '15 at 10:32
I just checked and it looks like the rpm I downloaded is for SLES 12. There isn't a 2.14 glibc for SLES11. Is that right?
– lbanz
Nov 20 '15 at 10:32
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Never install packages with rpm directly. Use zypper
.
And where you get that rpm .. On SLE11 is glibc-2.11.x and on SLE12 is glibc-2.19.x
Plus replacing this low level system package by another, unknown source version BROKE your system.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1003129%2fsles-11-update-glibc-using-rpm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Never install packages with rpm directly. Use zypper
.
And where you get that rpm .. On SLE11 is glibc-2.11.x and on SLE12 is glibc-2.19.x
Plus replacing this low level system package by another, unknown source version BROKE your system.
add a comment |
Never install packages with rpm directly. Use zypper
.
And where you get that rpm .. On SLE11 is glibc-2.11.x and on SLE12 is glibc-2.19.x
Plus replacing this low level system package by another, unknown source version BROKE your system.
add a comment |
Never install packages with rpm directly. Use zypper
.
And where you get that rpm .. On SLE11 is glibc-2.11.x and on SLE12 is glibc-2.19.x
Plus replacing this low level system package by another, unknown source version BROKE your system.
Never install packages with rpm directly. Use zypper
.
And where you get that rpm .. On SLE11 is glibc-2.11.x and on SLE12 is glibc-2.19.x
Plus replacing this low level system package by another, unknown source version BROKE your system.
answered Oct 30 '16 at 20:24
mimi.vxmimi.vx
22519
22519
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1003129%2fsles-11-update-glibc-using-rpm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
I just checked and it looks like the rpm I downloaded is for SLES 12. There isn't a 2.14 glibc for SLES11. Is that right?
– lbanz
Nov 20 '15 at 10:32